Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

User avatar
akorcovelos
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:07 pm
Location: Antioch, IL
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by akorcovelos »

Tuscany wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:57 am Actually, the 6.4L Powerstroke was magical, and IMO and many others.., still is the best power making small diesel engine ever made, and I'll explain. I used to be heavy into diesel performance..(long winded)

When Navistar/Ford introduced the 2008 6.4L diesel, the "only" technology emissions equipment available to pass Federal Tier III emission standards were from exclusive use of Exhaust Gas Recirculation, or EGR. What that is in a nutshell was to introduce exhaust back into the intake which reduced the harmful NOx output by cutting out available oxygen to burn. VERY archaic, but that is what they had. The engine was breathing its own feces, destroying oil and rings, eating fuel below 10 MPG, taking out injectors while slowly killing itself. It's the same reason Caterpillar, the most noteworthy semi engine of our time left class 8 trucks in 2010 after struggling with EGR . The engines simply would choke and die from within, usually within 100,000 miles. That engine used to be worth 1.5 million miles before a major overhaul.

Take the 6.4L, delete the EGR and DPF and then upload a custom aftermarket tune. Usually done with a $2,500 investment and available from many tune companies like Spartan, KEM, PPE and others. I used KEM. You could transform that engine and make 600 horses and almost 1,200 ft lbs. of torque, run close to 18-23 MPG, and last over 300K miles easy. The 6.4L had a lift pump that could flow ungodly amounts of fuel, stock compound turbos running building an easy 40#s of boost, and a fuel rail that could deliver gallons straight from Navistar, all with easily managed exhaust temps. Components that now cost thousands of dollars to make a new diesel make power came STOCK on the 6.4L. Sounds crazy, but my truck could turn an 11.98 quarter, and pass anything on the road towing a trailer. Just find a 6.4L burning dirty from the tail pipe, and you will have your hands full at a stop light. There are a lot of deleted survivors still out there. The rest are probably dead from EGR. I kept that truck for 8 years, and it was tough to let go.

Pittsburgh diesel had made a living converting C-15 Caterpillar engines back on the road as Glider kits because once you strip the EGR, you have a reliable monster. So successful and popular, a bone yard C-15 block are becoming scarce and almost priceless.

Today, EGR is still used as a very small supplement to SCR, which uses DEF to treat NOx in the exhaust after it has left the engine. As time goes on, less and less EGR is used, and more sophisticated SCR makes diesels whole again.



The 6.0L Powerstroke? Yeah, total junk and not worth its price in scrap metal. ..
I agree with everything here. My buddy had a 6.4 with an egr delete and SCT tuner and it would roll coal at idle, and it was a handshaker with the granny gear to boot. Awesome truck, but the 6.4 was still based on the 6.0 and suffered many of the same issues, minus the casting sand in the blocks of the 6.0 that got sorted out. Even with the egr delete reliability was an issue with the guys I knew running them, especially the injectors. Plus, unless you live in a non-emmisions county, it's a major PITA to put all the egr stuff back on and return to stock tune to pass 2 year testing. They for sure can make mad power with minimal investment, but I look for reliability in a truck. I have a race car and a muscle car, I don't need to melt tires in my truck. Not to say I don't have fun with it, my 7.3 is far from stock and makes respectable numbers for an old inefficient 7.3.

This was my buddy's 6.4, that he sold for a 7.3 quad cab dually:
IMG_2900.jpg
and this is me needlessly beating on my school bus powered Ford, lol:
sled pull 3.jpeg
sled pulling1.JPG
I'm at a place in life where I just want a comfortable reliable truck to haul/hunt with, and the 6.7s make WAY more power than my modded 7.3 probably does, so when the time is right I'll upgrade.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
1996 252 Whipple tuned 454 Magnum MPI, 496 exhaust, Corsa Captains Call, B3 w/Simrek drive shower.
‘Direct Deposit Too
Antioch, IL
Fox Chain O' Lakes
JTinMO
Captain
Captain
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 8:30 am
Location: Kansas City, MO
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by JTinMO »

While on the topic of Powerstroke's, what is everyone's thoughts on the 3.0L Powerstroke in the F150s. I've got a 5.4L F150 on it's last leg. It needs to be replaced in the next year and have been kicking around the baby Powerstoke as an option. Seems to be the best way to get good gas mileage for commuting, while a decent towing truck for the boat on weekends. Thoughts?
2010 Cobalt 232 8.1Gi
User avatar
Ytmsn
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 5377
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:34 am
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by Ytmsn »

JTinMO wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:32 pm While on the topic of Powerstroke's, what is everyone's thoughts on the 3.0L Powerstroke in the F150s. I've got a 5.4L F150 on it's last leg. It needs to be replaced in the next year and have been kicking around the baby Powerstoke as an option. Seems to be the best way to get good gas mileage for commuting, while a decent towing truck for the boat on weekends. Thoughts?
If you want a fuel efficient motor but something with enough torque to pull a load in a half ton truck get the Ford 6 Banger EcoBoost. If you're getting a 3/4 ton make sure it has a big engine or resale will take a hit. My two cents
2001 262 502 GXI (because it sounds better than an 8.2)
From the Land of the Red Man
"Black Boats Matter"
#FARCON Marine / CC Core!
User avatar
NautiGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2849
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:10 pm
Location: Kentucky
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by NautiGirl »

Ytmsn wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:40 pm
JTinMO wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:32 pm While on the topic of Powerstroke's, what is everyone's thoughts on the 3.0L Powerstroke in the F150s. I've got a 5.4L F150 on it's last leg. It needs to be replaced in the next year and have been kicking around the baby Powerstoke as an option. Seems to be the best way to get good gas mileage for commuting, while a decent towing truck for the boat on weekends. Thoughts?
If you want a fuel efficient motor but something with enough torque to pull a load in a half ton truck get the Ford 6 Banger EcoBoost. If you're getting a 3/4 ton make sure it has a big engine or resale will take a hit. My two cents
Agree - the 3.0L PowerStroke is solving a problem that never existed. The 3.5 EcoBoost makes better power and will tow anything you can hook up to an F150. The 3.5 is a torque monster and with the 10 speed it stays in the power band really well.

I will say the 3.5 is more Boost and less Eco in my experience. Highway I see around 18mpg tops.

If forced induction gas engines are not your thing the 5.0 is an awesome engine that will tow just as well it just will need to rev higher to do it. In real world applications it gets about the same mpg as the 3.5 Eco.
JEFF & KATIE
TeamNAUTI
Ebony Black 2017 R5 8.2 Big Block
CANDIED RED 2007 222 6.2L Merc - Sold
1997 190 4.3 Volvo - Peak Cobalt Design and Manufacturing
KENTUCKY
"Pudgy the had down harder!"
User avatar
akorcovelos
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:07 pm
Location: Antioch, IL
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by akorcovelos »

Agree with all of the above. While I love diesels there is no market need for the 3.0 Powerstroke. Our 3.5 Ecoboost is a beast, even in the Expedition it's rated at 9500# towing capacity and has an integrated trailer control system, beyond a simple brake controller. I'll be pulling the Cobalt to MO next summer with it simply for the comfort over my 7.3, and it pulls the boat no problem. I had a 5.4 Expedition before the 3.5 and it was the worst engine I've had in any vehicle ever.
1996 252 Whipple tuned 454 Magnum MPI, 496 exhaust, Corsa Captains Call, B3 w/Simrek drive shower.
‘Direct Deposit Too
Antioch, IL
Fox Chain O' Lakes
User avatar
Tuscany
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:28 am
Location: near Buffalo, NY
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by Tuscany »

akorcovelos wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 11:58 am
Tuscany wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:57 am Actually, the 6.4L Powerstroke was magical, and IMO and many others.., still is the best power making small diesel engine ever made, and I'll explain. I used to be heavy into diesel performance..(long winded)

When Navistar/Ford introduced the 2008 6.4L diesel, the "only" technology emissions equipment available to pass Federal Tier III emission standards were from exclusive use of Exhaust Gas Recirculation, or EGR. What that is in a nutshell was to introduce exhaust back into the intake which reduced the harmful NOx output by cutting out available oxygen to burn. VERY archaic, but that is what they had. The engine was breathing its own feces, destroying oil and rings, eating fuel below 10 MPG, taking out injectors while slowly killing itself. It's the same reason Caterpillar, the most noteworthy semi engine of our time left class 8 trucks in 2010 after struggling with EGR . The engines simply would choke and die from within, usually within 100,000 miles. That engine used to be worth 1.5 million miles before a major overhaul.

Take the 6.4L, delete the EGR and DPF and then upload a custom aftermarket tune. Usually done with a $2,500 investment and available from many tune companies like Spartan, KEM, PPE and others. I used KEM. You could transform that engine and make 600 horses and almost 1,200 ft lbs. of torque, run close to 18-23 MPG, and last over 300K miles easy. The 6.4L had a lift pump that could flow ungodly amounts of fuel, stock compound turbos running building an easy 40#s of boost, and a fuel rail that could deliver gallons straight from Navistar, all with easily managed exhaust temps. Components that now cost thousands of dollars to make a new diesel make power came STOCK on the 6.4L. Sounds crazy, but my truck could turn an 11.98 quarter, and pass anything on the road towing a trailer. Just find a 6.4L burning dirty from the tail pipe, and you will have your hands full at a stop light. There are a lot of deleted survivors still out there. The rest are probably dead from EGR. I kept that truck for 8 years, and it was tough to let go.

Pittsburgh diesel had made a living converting C-15 Caterpillar engines back on the road as Glider kits because once you strip the EGR, you have a reliable monster. So successful and popular, a bone yard C-15 block are becoming scarce and almost priceless.

Today, EGR is still used as a very small supplement to SCR, which uses DEF to treat NOx in the exhaust after it has left the engine. As time goes on, less and less EGR is used, and more sophisticated SCR makes diesels whole again.



The 6.0L Powerstroke? Yeah, total junk and not worth its price in scrap metal. ..
I agree with everything here. My buddy had a 6.4 with an egr delete and SCT tuner and it would roll coal at idle, and it was a handshaker with the granny gear to boot. Awesome truck, but the 6.4 was still based on the 6.0 and suffered many of the same issues, minus the casting sand in the blocks of the 6.0 that got sorted out. Even with the egr delete reliability was an issue with the guys I knew running them, especially the injectors. Plus, unless you live in a non-emmisions county, it's a major PITA to put all the egr stuff back on and return to stock tune to pass 2 year testing. They for sure can make mad power with minimal investment, but I look for reliability in a truck. I have a race car and a muscle car, I don't need to melt tires in my truck. Not to say I don't have fun with it, my 7.3 is far from stock and makes respectable numbers for an old inefficient 7.3.

This was my buddy's 6.4, that he sold for a 7.3 quad cab dually:
IMG_2900.jpg

and this is me needlessly beating on my school bus powered Ford, lol:
sled pull 3.jpeg
sled pulling1.JPG

I'm at a place in life where I just want a comfortable reliable truck to haul/hunt with, and the 6.7s make WAY more power than my modded 7.3 probably does, so when the time is right I'll upgrade.
I was never a 7.3 fan. I had an early 99’ SD with the good turbo where the bolts didn’t fall out... Reliable to a fault I know, worth 500k of mileage, but a not the most powerful engine, even when tuned. Just very utilitarian. I traded it for one of the first 6.0L engines. Remember those early screaming turbos?

Tuning the 6.4L wasn’t about burning rubber for me...ok, I lie a little.. just a little..🤣..
It was more about having an incredibly reliable truck free from EGR. It could pollute the Earth with a hit on the throttle, and very useful for tailgaters.
I never saw the complete EGR delete necessary because you could shut down the EGR valve on top of the engine electronically. The coolers were still on the truck, but posed no issue.

Although the 6.4L did share an updated block, the similarities ended there. The main issues with the 6.0L was head bolts so weak, that the heads lifted off the block. Also the electronic injectors suffered from bad O rings that allowed fuel to drain into the oil creating washed bearings. My 165 tuned 6.0 never had an issue, and I was extremely lucky. All of that was corrected with the 6.4L’s return to common rail injection and 5/8” head studs.

My 345 tuned engine put out some unvelieveable numbers. First and foremost, if you kept it under 65 MPH, you could assure yourself almost 25 MPH. It had a gas pedal that was so sensitive to input, you felt like you were driving a truck that weighed half as much. Power when towing? You would think I would be full of crap from the stories unless you were behind the wheel.

Today’s engines are designed with lift pumps and fuel rails that govern against what the 6.4L was able to do, and I get it. The new 6.7L is a super nice engine, and I don’t plan on changing a thing. They run great and are whisper quiet.
Last edited by Tuscany on Wed Dec 05, 2018 6:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
2017 Cobalt R7
"Cobalt" Blue
6.2L VP 380 or 430

#FARCON Marine
User avatar
Tuscany
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:28 am
Location: near Buffalo, NY
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by Tuscany »

NautiGirl wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 4:18 pm
Ytmsn wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:40 pm
JTinMO wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:32 pm While on the topic of Powerstroke's, what is everyone's thoughts on the 3.0L Powerstroke in the F150s. I've got a 5.4L F150 on it's last leg. It needs to be replaced in the next year and have been kicking around the baby Powerstoke as an option. Seems to be the best way to get good gas mileage for commuting, while a decent towing truck for the boat on weekends. Thoughts?
If you want a fuel efficient motor but something with enough torque to pull a load in a half ton truck get the Ford 6 Banger EcoBoost. If you're getting a 3/4 ton make sure it has a big engine or resale will take a hit. My two cents
Agree - the 3.0L PowerStroke is solving a problem that never existed. The 3.5 EcoBoost makes better power and will tow anything you can hook up to an F150. The 3.5 is a torque monster and with the 10 speed it stays in the power band really well.

I will say the 3.5 is more Boost and less Eco in my experience. Highway I see around 18mpg tops.

If forced induction gas engines are not your thing the 5.0 is an awesome engine that will tow just as well it just will need to rev higher to do it. In real world applications it gets about the same mpg as the 3.5 Eco.

I totally agree.
2017 Cobalt R7
"Cobalt" Blue
6.2L VP 380 or 430

#FARCON Marine
sailor55330
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1268
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 4:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by sailor55330 »

On paper, it seems to me Ford undertuned the 3.0 to make the Ecoboost look stronger. Seems like they left some on the table. I guess you'd still get the longevity out of the little powerstroke, but it doesn't scream "puller" to me.
User avatar
Ytmsn
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 5377
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:34 am
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by Ytmsn »

Hmmm... Maybe they built that little diesel to appeal to the same folks that would buy a Volt?
2001 262 502 GXI (because it sounds better than an 8.2)
From the Land of the Red Man
"Black Boats Matter"
#FARCON Marine / CC Core!
User avatar
NautiGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2849
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:10 pm
Location: Kentucky
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by NautiGirl »

sailor55330 wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 6:39 pm On paper, it seems to me Ford undertuned the 3.0 to make the Ecoboost look stronger. Seems like they left some on the table. I guess you'd still get the longevity out of the little powerstroke, but it doesn't scream "puller" to me.
Remember the 3.0 PowerStroke was an "EcoDiesel" that was originally used in European Market Land Rovers. It was designed to move a heavy SUV around and get decent MPG's doing it. It doesn't scream "puller" to you because it isn't one.

If anything Ford underrated the 5.0 to push people from the V8 platform to the new V6 Forced Induction EcoBoost. The Coyote is a very well designed engine that makes huge numbers on the dyno.

People asking for Diesel options in 1/2 ton trucks confuse me. With advancements in engine technology modern 1/2 ton trucks are not power limited in towing. Pick your favorite engine, the Ford 5.0, EcoBoost, GM 6.2 or Dodge 5.7 they are all going to be able to pull anything you will hook up to the truck. Your limit is going to be the GVWR of the truck.

If you are towing heavy enough that you need a diesel you most likely also need a 3/4 or 1 Ton platform to be able to handle the tongue weight of the trailer and still be below GVWR. At that point man up and buy a modern big boy diesel.
JEFF & KATIE
TeamNAUTI
Ebony Black 2017 R5 8.2 Big Block
CANDIED RED 2007 222 6.2L Merc - Sold
1997 190 4.3 Volvo - Peak Cobalt Design and Manufacturing
KENTUCKY
"Pudgy the had down harder!"
User avatar
akorcovelos
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:07 pm
Location: Antioch, IL
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by akorcovelos »

The only benefit I see for the 3.0, which isn’t a big one, is it’s convienant for farmers and construction sites that have diesel transfer tanks they can fill up on (road taxe). It’s nice to only need to stock one type of fuel on a site. As a fleet truck it may make some sales, but for consumer use, anyone who wants a diesel is going to be looking at the larger trucks.
1996 252 Whipple tuned 454 Magnum MPI, 496 exhaust, Corsa Captains Call, B3 w/Simrek drive shower.
‘Direct Deposit Too
Antioch, IL
Fox Chain O' Lakes
User avatar
NautiGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2849
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:10 pm
Location: Kentucky
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by NautiGirl »

akorcovelos wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:44 pm The only benefit I see for the 3.0, which isn’t a big one, is it’s convienant for farmers and construction sites that have diesel transfer tanks they can fill up on (road taxe). It’s nice to only need to stock one type of fuel on a site. As a fleet truck it may make some sales, but for consumer use, anyone who wants a diesel is going to be looking at the larger trucks.
Want to hear something really confusing...Ford only offers the 3.0 PowerStroke in lariat and above trims. Those are some really nice fleet trucks.
JEFF & KATIE
TeamNAUTI
Ebony Black 2017 R5 8.2 Big Block
CANDIED RED 2007 222 6.2L Merc - Sold
1997 190 4.3 Volvo - Peak Cobalt Design and Manufacturing
KENTUCKY
"Pudgy the had down harder!"
mdadgar
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:22 pm
Location: SF Bay Area
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by mdadgar »

I think you guys are totally missing the point of the 3.0 diesel in the F150. The 3.5 Ecoboost makes a ton of power but the gas mileage is truly abysmal, especially while towing. The diesel will get great mileage and still tow a ton of load.

I do think that Ford missed a trick with its rating, though. An early leak on the forthcoming GMC 3.0 straight six diesel says 280 hp and ~450 lb/ft of torque. That's more like it.

- Mark
Mark Dadgar
2013 Cobalt A25, 6.0 VP 380hp "More Cowbell"
Monte Sereno, CA (winter) | Lake Don Pedro (summer)
Boats are for when I'm not racing cars
User avatar
NautiGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2849
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:10 pm
Location: Kentucky
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by NautiGirl »

mdadgar wrote: Wed Dec 05, 2018 8:36 pm I think you guys are totally missing the point of the 3.0 diesel in the F150. The 3.5 Ecoboost makes a ton of power but the gas mileage is truly abysmal, especially while towing. The diesel will get great mileage and still tow a ton of load.

I do think that Ford missed a trick with its rating, though. An early leak on the forthcoming GMC 3.0 straight six diesel says 280 hp and ~450 lb/ft of torque. That's more like it.

- Mark
So Ford Says. I obviously have no experience /w the truck but Boating Magazine Tested one a couple month ago. They hooked up a 6,000lb boat and averaged 11.3 MPG. That is EcoBoost territory. It does look like it gets a bit better mpg than the EcoBoost unloaded though so if you are towing infrequently it could be a good choice. https://www.boatingmag.com/tested-fords ... 150#page-6

To get a feel for this model, we spent a long weekend with the diesel-powered F-150. We towed a 6,000-pound boat/trailer
with 600 pounds of tongue weight, and to be blunt, we should have towed a heavier boat. In tow/haul, we barely knew there
was a boat/trailer on our tail. Zero to 55 mph was a crisp 8 seconds (while chirping the tires a bit), and achieved an average
mpg of 11.3 while towing. Compare that to a 22.7 mpg average in Eco mode while not towing.


Power numbers seem pretty inline /w the GMC you mentioned think the Ford 3.0 is at 250hp and 440 lb/ft of torque. Pretty close.
JEFF & KATIE
TeamNAUTI
Ebony Black 2017 R5 8.2 Big Block
CANDIED RED 2007 222 6.2L Merc - Sold
1997 190 4.3 Volvo - Peak Cobalt Design and Manufacturing
KENTUCKY
"Pudgy the had down harder!"
User avatar
akorcovelos
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2981
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2018 10:07 pm
Location: Antioch, IL
Contact:

Re: Let's see your Tow rigs with your boat!

Post by akorcovelos »

We average 18mpg with the 3.5 in the heavy Expedition, so I do doubt for a second it will get as good or better unloaded mpg than the 3.0 in a lighter f150.

I didn’t realize the diesel was only offered in the top trim levels, big miss on Ford if you ask me.
1996 252 Whipple tuned 454 Magnum MPI, 496 exhaust, Corsa Captains Call, B3 w/Simrek drive shower.
‘Direct Deposit Too
Antioch, IL
Fox Chain O' Lakes
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 83 guests